Strategic manoeuvring between rhetorical effectiveness and dialectical reasonableness
Frans H van Eemeren
The pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation developed by van Eemeren and Grootendorst enables the analyst of argumentative discourse to make a normative reconstruction that results in an analytic overview of all elements in the discourse that are pertinent to a critical evaluation, but according to van Eemeren and Houtlosser this reconstruction can be further refined and better accounted for if the theory is extended by including a rhetorical dimension. Developing such an extended theory, which will also enable a more realistic treatment of the fallacies in the evaluation of argumentative discourse, was the aim of van Eemeren and Houtlosser’s research project Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse.−Although the dialectical and the rhetorical approach to argumentative discourse were closely connected in Antiquity, and have remained connected for a long time, in modern times they have grown apart. Nowadays there is a paradigmatic division between dialectical and rhetorical approaches, which causes a conceptual and communicative gap between their protagonists. According to van Eemeren and Houtlosser this gap hinders the desired development of a full-fledged theory of argumentation and is, in fact, unnecessary. In their view, the gap can be bridged by introducing the theoretical concept of “strategic manoeuvring”, which makes it possible to integrate rhetorical insight into a dialectical framework of analysis. Strategic manoeuvring refers to the efforts arguers make to reconcile their aiming for rhetorical effectiveness with maintaining dialectical standards of reasonableness. In his presentation, van Eemeren will discuss the concept of strategic manoeuvring in more detail. In the process, he will explain the main ingredients of the new framework of analysis and evaluation that was developed the Strategic Manoeuvring project
—
ISBN:
eISBN: 978-989-26-0498-5
DOI: 10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_3
Área: Artes e Humanidades
Páginas: 55-72
Data: 2009
Keywords
—
Outros Capítulos (18)
The pertinence of Toulmin and Perelman/Olbrechts-Tyteca for informal logic
John Anthony Blair
https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_1
Perelman and Toulmin as philosophers : on the inalienable connection between philosophy, rhetoric and argumentation
Henrique Jales Ribeiro
https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_2
Strategic manoeuvring between rhetorical effectiveness and dialectical reasonableness
Frans H van Eemeren
https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_3
Praeteritio as strategic manoeuvring
A Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_4
Anticipating objections in argumentation
Douglas Walton
https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_5
Cooperation and competition in argumentative exchanges
Erik C W Krabbe
https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_6
Beyond argumentativeness: the unity of argumentation
Rui Alexandre Grácio
https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_7
Argumentation rhétorique et argumentation linguistique
Oswald Ducrot
https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_8
Co-constructing the “reasonable” in verbal exchanges : theory of argumentation and discourse analysis
Ruth Amossy
https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_9
Acte et personnne dans l’ar gumentation: le cas du proces d'intention
Marianne Doury
https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_10
Les éthé, leur poids, et comment s’en debarrasser
Christian Plantin
https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_11
Solving the mystery of presence: verbal/visual interactionin Darwin’s structure and distribution of coral reefs
Alan G Gross
https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_12
Retórica da imagem?
Tito Cardoso e Cunha
https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_13
Da retórica às indústrias da persuasão
António Fidalgo
https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_14
A retórica: disciplina de comunicação: una e múltipla, na sociedade e na escola
José Nunes Esteves Rei
https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_15
Se toda a argumentação é retórica, então toda a retórica deve ser oratória: Chaïm Perelman versus Olivier Reboul
Joaquim Neves Vicente
https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_16
Perelman, the use of the “pseudo-argument” and human rights
Guy Haarscher
https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_17
Nova retórica e democratização da justiça
Hermenegildo Ferreira Borges
https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_18