/ Catálogo / Livro / Capítulo

Strategic manoeuvring between rhetorical effectiveness and dialectical reasonableness

≈ 2 mins de leitura

Frans H van Eemeren

The pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation developed by van Eemeren and Grootendorst enables the analyst of argumentative discourse to make a normative reconstruction that results in an analytic overview of all elements in the discourse that are pertinent to a critical evaluation, but according to van Eemeren and Houtlosser this reconstruction can be further refined and better accounted for if the theory is extended by including a rhetorical dimension. Developing such an extended theory, which will also enable a more realistic treatment of the fallacies in the evaluation of argumentative discourse, was the aim of van Eemeren and Houtlosser’s research project Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse.−Although the dialectical and the rhetorical approach to argumentative discourse were closely connected in Antiquity, and have remained connected for a long time, in modern times they have grown apart. Nowadays there is a paradigmatic division between dialectical and rhetorical approaches, which causes a conceptual and communicative gap between their protagonists. According to van Eemeren and Houtlosser this gap hinders the desired development of a full-fledged theory of argumentation and is, in fact, unnecessary. In their view, the gap can be bridged by introducing the theoretical concept of “strategic manoeuvring”, which makes it possible to integrate rhetorical insight into a dialectical framework of analysis. Strategic manoeuvring refers to the efforts arguers make to reconcile their aiming for rhetorical effectiveness with maintaining dialectical standards of reasonableness. In his presentation, van Eemeren will discuss the concept of strategic manoeuvring in more detail. In the process, he will explain the main ingredients of the new framework of analysis and evaluation that was developed the Strategic Manoeuvring project


ISBN:

eISBN: 978-989-26-0498-5
DOI: 10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_3
Área: Artes e Humanidades
Páginas: 55-72
Data: 2009

Keywords

Download


Outros Capítulos (18)

The pertinence of Toulmin and Perelman/Olbrechts-Tyteca for informal logic

John Anthony Blair

https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_1

Perelman and Toulmin as philosophers : on the inalienable connection between philosophy, rhetoric and argumentation

Henrique Jales Ribeiro

https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_2

Strategic manoeuvring between rhetorical effectiveness and dialectical reasonableness

Frans H van Eemeren

https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_3

Praeteritio as strategic manoeuvring

A Francisca Snoeck Henkemans

https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_4

Anticipating objections in argumentation

Douglas Walton

https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_5

Cooperation and competition in argumentative exchanges

Erik C W Krabbe

https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_6

Beyond argumentativeness: the unity of argumentation

Rui Alexandre Grácio

https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_7

Argumentation rhétorique et argumentation linguistique

Oswald Ducrot

https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_8

Co-constructing the “reasonable” in verbal exchanges : theory of argumentation and discourse analysis

Ruth Amossy

https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_9

Acte et personnne dans l’ar gumentation: le cas du proces d'intention

Marianne Doury

https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_10

Les éthé, leur poids, et comment s’en debarrasser

Christian Plantin

https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_11

Solving the mystery of presence: verbal/visual interactionin Darwin’s structure and distribution of coral reefs

Alan G Gross

https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_12

Retórica da imagem?

Tito Cardoso e Cunha

https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_13

Da retórica às indústrias da persuasão

António Fidalgo

https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_14

A retórica: disciplina de comunicação: una e múltipla, na sociedade e na escola

José Nunes Esteves Rei

https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_15

Se toda a argumentação é retórica, então toda a retórica deve ser oratória: Chaïm Perelman versus Olivier Reboul

Joaquim Neves Vicente

https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_16

Perelman, the use of the “pseudo-argument” and human rights

Guy Haarscher

https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_17

Nova retórica e democratização da justiça

Hermenegildo Ferreira Borges

https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_18